THE AYLLU MODEL OF WARISATA

The foundation of Warisata was the Ayllu model, a form of community organization based on participation, cooperation, and reciprocity. The school recognized that the community possessed knowledge, values, and institutions that could decisively contribute to education.

The Escuela-Ayllu (Ayllu School) developed an innovative educational model that integrated academic teaching with productive work, culture, and community life. Its proposal was not limited to teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic. It sought to form individuals capable of thinking, creating, working, and contributing to the well-being of their environment.

Students participated in carpentry, blacksmithing, weaving, construction, and other workshops. They also farmed the land, cared for animals, and learned skills related to agriculture and production. In this way, they understood that work was not a punishment, but a dignified activity that allowed them to develop skills, generate resources, and improve living conditions.

The Ayllu Model is based on five universal values or principles plus one: liberation, communal organization, communal production, the revaluation of cultural identity, solidarity and reciprocity, and the community as their foundation. These represent the body and the five dismembered limbs of Tupak Katari, which were scattered across various provinces, symbolizing the pierced and divided Ayllu. Uniting these aspects means restructuring the Ayllu and fulfilling what Tupak Katari said: “I will return and I will be millions.”

This systematization opens up many expectations in history, pedagogy, literature, and philosophy, without even touching upon other sciences such as sociology, anthropology, ethnography, and many others. Historically, the Warisata Escuela-Ayllu is the most important milestone in the Republic.

Pedagogically, it is the only Indigenous experience of its kind in national life. Literarily, the community members, in their eagerness to read and write, wrote an epic. Philosophically, this model offers us endless possibilities to achieve many goals, such as a Cultural Revolution of the Indigenous Nations, laws, and municipal proposals, all the way to the long-awaited Constituent Assembly, as it responds to our unique way of being and thinking.

Liberation.- The yearning to learn to read and write as a way of reclaiming Indigenous rights and defending communal lands made them realize they could not be educated to be pongos (servants/serfs). Thus, education generated a social movement under a Sacred Cause or liberating fire. Building schools was an inescapable duty carried out under a communal oath, achieving human development with unprecedented enthusiasm and acting as factors of self-determination for Indigenous peoples. Education as hope and future was a new form of Indigenous rebellion that landowners and members of the ruling middle class were unwilling to tolerate.

Communal Organization.- The self-government and organization of the School and Ayllu core—or of the other 16 cores—was exercised by the Council, Parlamento Amauta (Amauta Parliament), Cabildo, or Capitanía, with firm, honest, and disciplined leadership, achieving success in each of its wise decisions. These were institutions reminiscent of the ancestral Ulaqa, valid for both the eastern lowlands and the western highlands. A communal assembly elects representatives by consensus, forming an Administrative Council, from which Commissions emerge to practically exercise the mandate, both being coordinated by a Director. Their service is carried out for prestige and in retribution to the Community, the latter serving as the foundation of the School.

Communal Production.- The productive educational strategy of the Classroom, Workshop, Planting Field, Ayni, and Ma Ch´amaki ("A single effort") developed industries, cooperatives, fairs, and agricultural enterprises aimed at self-sufficiency, improving living conditions and quality of life. One wonders what they lacked, for their pantries were always full; in the workshops and fields, everything was produced—not only utilitarian goods (as the Palace of Education was built entirely from materials from the surrounding region and by the hands of community members), but also artistic ones, giving rise to Neo-Indian art.

Revaluation of Cultural Identity.- A very strong component of cultural identity emanated from this educational center, which revalued everything our culture meant, exalting and protecting moral, ethical, aesthetic, religious, ecological, linguistic, and heritage values, among others. Its very structure was based on the foundations of the Ayllu and the Marka, a heritage from several centuries ago, demonstrating that such knowledge was current and productive.

Solidarity and Reciprocity.- Consensus, collaboration, and communal commitment in school activities without ethnic-economic social differences—under ancestral tutelary institutions such as Ayni, Mink´a, Utawawa, Tayka, Marka, and others—is the expression of complex economic-ethical exchange and retributive relationships: from and toward the community member, the community, the land, and ideals. This achieved prosperity and geopolitical expansion from the countryside to the city (nuclear system), the nation, and Latin America.

The Community.- It is the foundation of the fundamental values or principles of the Ayllu Model; it can also represent society, the city, or the Municipality.